Previously, the Centre placed the state under the rules of the presidents, ensuring that the agreement of the governor of Jammu and Kashmir was obtained without problem in the nemeration of the provisions of the article and, finally, the annulment of Article 35A, much more controversial, which granted special provisions to J-K. Section 370 is part of the original Constitution and has been described as “temporary” in Part XXI. , transitional and special provisions – Article 370 – temporary provisions concerning the State of Jammu and Kashmir.” The third paragraph of the article reads: “Notwithstanding the above provisions of this article, the Chair may declare, through a public communication, that this section is no longer in force or is effective only with such exceptions and amendments and from the date he has set.” The condition set out in Trap 2 to submit it to the ratification of the Constituent Assembly of J-K was effected by the transformation of the term into the Legislative Assembly. And because the Legislature was suspended because of the presidential rule, the governor automatically became the head of state. His acquiescence was not a problem. In the case of Jammu and Kashmir, representatives of the Constituent Assembly requested that only the provisions of the Indian Constitution corresponding to the initial instrument of accession be applied to the State and that the State Constituent Assembly, when constituted, decide on the other issues. The Indian government accepted the requests just before the meeting with the other states. [Note 1] As a result, Article 370 was introduced into the Indian Constitution, which provided that other articles of the Constitution that left powers to the central government would only be applied to Jammu and Kashmir with the agreement of the State Constituent Assembly. This is a “temporary provision” because its applicability has been made up to the formulation and adoption of the state constitution.  However, the State Constituent Assembly dissolved on January 25, 1957 without recommending the repeal or amendment of section 370. Thus, the article was considered an integral part of the Indian Constitution, as confirmed by several decisions of the Supreme Court of India and the Supreme Court of Jammu and Kashmir, the last of which was upheld in April 2018.    On August 5, the Centre adopted, using Section 370 provisions 1 and 3, a presidential regulation declaring that the section no longer existed. It amended the article to transform Sadr-i-Riyasat into governor of the state and transform the words Constituent Assembly into jammu and Kashmir state laws. The original article had the mandatory provision to obtain prior approval from the Constituent Assembly before amendments were made to the article or all were repealed together. The 2019 presidential decree also added clause (4) containing four sub-clauses to Article 367 under “Interpretations.” The phrase “Sadar-i-Riyasat, which acts on the assistance and advice of the Council of Ministers” is interpreted as the “Governor of Jammu and Kashmir.” The term “state government” includes the governor. Provided that Article 370 of the Constitution is invoked, the term “Constituent Assembly of the State in accordance with clause (2) ” is “State Legislative Assembly.”  [Note 9] According to Jill Cottrell, some of the presidential orders have been adopted under section 370 in similar circumstances since 1954, when the state was under the presidential system. In these circumstances, EU governments have interpreted the “convergence of government” as the governor.  [Note 6] According to the Constitution, Article 370 could only be amended with the agreement of the “state government.
By // by darrenjac